Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 21% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7600K - 214 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $75.0 vs $578.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900 - $0.42 vs $2.71 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.71/FPS
15.498154981549813%
Price, $
$578.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $578.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
177
82.71028037383178%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1507
51.1541072640869%
Multi-Core
4226
26.640610225052008%
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |