Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2200 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 67% better in F1 23 than Core i5-7400 - 340 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $123.76 vs $569.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-13900KS - $0.61 vs $1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
340
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
36%
Price, $
$569.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $569.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
203
59%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$123.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $123.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |