Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1360 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-9100F - 200 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $80.0 vs $479.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-13900KS - $0.46 vs $2.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
19.166666666666668%
Price, $
$479.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $479.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
44.251207729468604%
Multi-Core
3669
16.804836715064354%
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |