Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3783 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 33% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3220 - 499 vs 374 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $72.9 vs $589.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900KS - $0.19 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 55 vs 150 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
499
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
16%
Price, $
$589.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $589.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Buy for $72.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
150 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |