Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-9900 - 150 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $339.0 vs $469.99
- Up to 21% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-13900KF - $2.47 vs $3.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.13/FPS
78%
Price, $
$469.99
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2617 minutes ago
Buy for $339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2618 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |