Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 327 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-12900KF - 136 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $272.99 vs $469.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900KF - $2.13 vs $3.46 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.46/FPS
61%
Price, $
$469.99
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2517 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
128
94%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$272.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $272.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |