Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-11900 - 191 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $270.0 vs $469.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-13900KF - $1.54 vs $2.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
62%
Price, $
$469.99
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5722 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
91%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5722 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |