Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900F - 164 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $225.0 vs $469.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900KF - $1.68 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
58%
Price, $
$469.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5341 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
81%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |