Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 263 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $140.0 vs $461.98
- Up to 66% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900K - $0.59 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
33%
Price, $
$461.98
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $461.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |