Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3683 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Control than FX-4130 - 208 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $22.92 vs $488.81
- Up to 95% better value when playing Control than Core i9-13900K - $0.12 vs $2.35 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $488.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |