Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 350 days newer than Ryzen 9 6900HX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 9 6900HX - 164 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$419.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Single-Core
1979
72.49084249084248%
Multi-Core
9532
55.35745397525989%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rembrandt |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket FP7 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 45 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 6 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |