Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-7600K - 186 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $75.0 vs $542.43
- Up to 84% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-13900 - $0.46 vs $2.92 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.92/FPS
15.753424657534248%
Price, $
$542.43
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $542.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
164
88.17204301075269%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1507
55.52689756816507%
Multi-Core
4226
25.727505174723%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |