Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1952 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 29% better in Minecraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 864 vs 671 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $109.99 vs $490.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-13900 - $0.16 vs $0.57 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
671
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |