Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-7700T - 212 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $150.0 vs $353.84
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900KF - $0.82 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
49%
Price, $
$353.84
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $353.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |