Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7500T - 203 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $69.0 vs $272.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-12900KF - $0.41 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
30%
Price, $
$272.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $272.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16074 minutes ago
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |