Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1547 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 470 vs 403 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $282.99 vs $819.3
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 32 vs 24 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $282.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76688 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
403
85.74468085106382%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$819.3
34%
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
46.06608969315499%
Multi-Core
7539
50.661917881862784%
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |