Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2986 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 38% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 261 vs 189 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 115 vs 125 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 12 |
| 24 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 115 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
