Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i9-12900K vs Core i5-4690

Core i9-12900K vs Core i5-4690: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-12900K

3.2 GHz | 16-core

Intel Core i9-12900K Logo
Intel Core i9-12900K Gaming Desktop Processor with Integrated Graphics and 16 (8P+8E) Cores up to 5.2 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W

Buy for $267 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 259 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i5-4690

3.5 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i5-4690 Logo
Intel Core i5-4690 Processor (6M Cache, 3.5 GHz upto 3.90 GHz) BX80646I54690, CPU Only

Buy for $120.3 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 264 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-12900K

3.2 GHz | 16-core

Intel Core i9-12900K Logo
Intel Core i9-12900K Gaming Desktop Processor with Integrated Graphics and 16 (8P+8E) Cores up to 5.2 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W

Buy for $267 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 259 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i5-4690

3.5 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i5-4690 Logo
Intel Core i5-4690 Processor (6M Cache, 3.5 GHz upto 3.90 GHz) BX80646I54690, CPU Only

Buy for $120.3 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 264 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2744 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K

  • Performs up to 50% better in F1 23 than Core i5-4690 - 307 vs 204 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 24 vs 4 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690

  • Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $120.3 vs $267.0
  • Up to 32% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-12900K - $0.59 vs $0.87 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 84 vs 125 Watts
This is a free version of F1 23.
F1 23

F1 23

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Core i9-12900K Logo
Core i9-12900K

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021


FPS

307

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.87/FPS

67.81609195402298%

Price, $

$267

45%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-12900K Gaming Desktop Processor with Integrated Graphics and 16 (8P+8E) Cores up to 5.2 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W

Buy for $267 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 259 minutes ago

Intel Core i5-4690 Logo
Core i5-4690

Desktop • May 1st, 2014


FPS

204

66.44951140065146%

Value, $/FPS

$0.59/FPS

100%

Price, $

$120.3

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i5-4690 Processor (6M Cache, 3.5 GHz upto 3.90 GHz) BX80646I54690, CPU Only

Buy for $120.3 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 264 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Core i9-12900K Logo
Core i9-12900K

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021

Intel Core i5-4690 Logo
Core i5-4690

Desktop • May 1st, 2014

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i9-12900K Logo
Core i9-12900K

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021


Single-Core

2620

100%

Multi-Core

15445

100%

Intel Core i5-4690 Logo
Core i5-4690

Desktop • May 1st, 2014


Single-Core

1191

45.458015267175576%

Multi-Core

3303

21.385561670443508%

Intel Core i9-12900K

vs

Intel Core i5-4690

Nov 4th, 2021
Release DateMay 1st, 2014
Core i9CollectionCore i5
Alder LakeCodenameHaswell
Intel Socket 1700SocketIntel Socket 1150
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
16
Cores4
24
Threads4
3.2 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed3.9 GHz
125 WTDP
84 W
10 nm
Process Size22 nm
32.0xMultiplier
34.0x
UHD Graphics 770Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 4600
Yes
OverclockableNo

Builds Using Core i9-12900K or Core i5-4690

F1 23, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.