Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3349 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3240T - 196 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $25.7 vs $298.85
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $298.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76741 minutes ago
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
17.06106870229008%
Multi-Core
971
6.2868242149562965%
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |