Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 820 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than EPYC 7302P - 289 vs 269 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 125 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 32 vs 24 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | AMD EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | EPYC |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Rome |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 16 | Cores | 16 |
| 24 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 155 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
