Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7500T - 212 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $69.0 vs $411.33
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900F - $0.38 vs $1.94 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
19%
Price, $
$411.33
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $411.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7177 minutes ago
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |