Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900F is 539 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 35% better in League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 328 vs 243 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $360.95 vs $1525.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $1.1 vs $6.28 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 64 vs 24 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
328
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$360.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $360.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1544 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
243
74.08536585365853%
Value, $/FPS
$6.28/FPS
17.515923566878982%
Price, $
$1525
23%
Buy for $1,525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1542 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
65.1831429696731%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 32 |
24 | Threads | 64 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |