Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1189 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 29% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 144 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $197.65 vs $458.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing New World than Core i9-12900 - $1.76 vs $3.18 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
77%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |