Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 42% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8150 - 218 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $64.03 vs $431.61
- Up to 79% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-12900 - $0.42 vs $1.98 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $431.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |