Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 245 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 254 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $270.0 vs $1525.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $1.06 vs $6.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 64 vs 16 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
245
96.45669291338582%
Value, $/FPS
$6.22/FPS
17.04180064308682%
Price, $
$1525
17%
Buy for $1,525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
71.42857142857143%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |