Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 245 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 676 vs 590 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $232.0 vs $2440.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $0.34 vs $4.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 64 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
676
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$232
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $232 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14073 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
590
87%
Value, $/FPS
$4.14/FPS
8%
Price, $
$2440
9%
Buy for $2,440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14073 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |