Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3228 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 25% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 237 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 69 vs 125 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$265
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 69 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |