Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900K outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2835 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield IV than FX-9590 - 462 vs 375 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than FX-9590 - $265.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 28% better value when playing Battlefield IV than FX-9590 - $0.57 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
462
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$265
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7362 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7361 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |