Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1062 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 2600X - 146 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $99.97 vs $210.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-11900F - $0.78 vs $1.44 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13777 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13777 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |