Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1283 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 18% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-7920X - 651 vs 553 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $270.0 vs $557.04
- Up to 59% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-7920X - $0.41 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 24 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
651
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9289 minutes ago
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |