Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2835 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-9590 - 252 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than FX-9590 - $270.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 18% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than FX-9590 - $1.07 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
252
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3864 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3864 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |