Buy on Amazon
$1,099
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 814 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 26% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 3 1200 - 387 vs 306 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 36 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - $395.0 vs $1099.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10980XE - $1.29 vs $2.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 65 vs 165 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
387
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
45%
Price, $
$1099
35%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9 i9-10980XE Octadeca-core (18 Core) 3 GHz Processor - 24.75 MB Cache - 4.60 GHz Overclocking Speed - 14 nm - 165 W - 36 Threads
Buy for $1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9378 minutes ago
Acer Chromebook Plus 514 Laptop – 14" WUXGA 1920 x 1200 IPS Touch Display | AMD Ryzen 3 7320C | 8GB LPDDR5X | 128GB eMMC | Wi-Fi 6E | FHD Facial Auto Exposure Camera | Chrome OS | CB514-3HT-R8RB
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9379 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 4 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
