Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 1019 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G3930T - 236 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $39.0 vs $827.78
- Up to 95% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-10920X - $0.17 vs $3.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $827.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |