Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 614 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2400G - 181 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $135.0 vs $899.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10920X - $0.81 vs $4.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.97/FPS
16.297786720321934%
Price, $
$899
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51189 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
166
91.71270718232044%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
63.104477611940304%
Multi-Core
3294
29.024583663758925%
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |