Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 393% better in League of Legends than Celeron G550 - 217 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $19.59 vs $249.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-10900KF - $0.45 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
39.130434782608695%
Price, $
$249
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1657 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
44
20.276497695852534%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1649 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
21.837776517300057%
Multi-Core
629
6.871313087175006%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |