Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 75 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 219 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $249.0 vs $1525.0
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 64 vs 20 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
216
98.63013698630137%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$1525
16%
Buy for $1,525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
93.87407827566648%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
20 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |