Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K and the cheaper Core i9-10900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Diablo IV than Core i9-10900F - 225 vs 218 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $239.69 vs $399.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-10900K - $1.1 vs $1.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
61%
Price, $
$399.99
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
218
96%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $239.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |