Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-3330 - 261 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $99.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-10900K - $0.44 vs $1.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
261
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
24.444444444444443%
Price, $
$490
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
251
96.16858237547893%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
555
31.732418524871353%
Multi-Core
1643
17.930808687111206%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |