Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600XT on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600XT.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3600XT - 194 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $168.11 vs $469.99
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Buy for $168.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1704
97.42710120068611%
Multi-Core
7222
78.81698133798974%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |