Buy on Amazon
$259.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $64
Availability
MSRP in USD: $64
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G5400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G5400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 759 days newer than the cheaper Pentium Gold G5400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Far Cry 5 than Pentium Gold G5400T - 217 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $59.95 vs $259.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i9-10900F - $0.32 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
26%
Price, $
$259.99
23%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Pentium Gold G5400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
188
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G5400T Processor 4M Cache 3.10 GHz LGA1151 (OEM Tray CPU)
Buy for $59.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Pentium Gold G5400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
