Buy on Amazon
$267.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 156% better in League of Legends than Core i7-4930K - 210 vs 82 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930K - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $100.0 vs $267.7
- Up to 4% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-10900 - $1.22 vs $1.27 per FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $267.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-4930K Processor - BX80633I74930K
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-4930K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
