Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $279.76 vs $899.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-13400F - $1.14 vs $3.54 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10900 - 254 vs 246 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
96%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $279.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.54/FPS
32%
Price, $
$899.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |