Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4370 - 209 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $48.5 vs $273.11
- Up to 82% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-10900 - $0.24 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
18%
Price, $
$273.11
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $273.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
202
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |