Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 11% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-3240T - 302 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $25.7 vs $415.77
- Up to 93% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-10900 - $0.09 vs $1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
302
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
6.521739130434782%
Price, $
$415.77
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $415.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
273
90.39735099337747%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
26.23239436619718%
Multi-Core
971
11.530697066856668%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |