Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900 is 75 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 112 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $415.77 vs $1525.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $3.71 vs $13.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 64 vs 20 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$415.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $415.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
111
99.10714285714286%
Value, $/FPS
$13.74/FPS
27.00145560407569%
Price, $
$1525
27%
Buy for $1,525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
97.1244131455399%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
20 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |