Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $273.15 vs $1675.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $1.3 vs $6.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 14% better in League of Legends than Core i9-10900 - 240 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 64 vs 20 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
210
87%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$273.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $273.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.98/FPS
18%
Price, $
$1675
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,675 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
20 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |