Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10850K outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2603 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9590 - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than FX-9590 - $279.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 13% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-9590 - $2.02 vs $2.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10814 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10813 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |