Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-980X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-980X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 4018 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-980X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-980X
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $87.8 vs $210.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-11900F - $0.78 vs $1.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-980X - 130 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-980X - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-980X - 16 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2010
FPS
112
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$87.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $87.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-980X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Gulftown | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |