Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 2349 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 31% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 194 vs 148 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 69 vs 95 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$252
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $252 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 69 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |