Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 1969 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 29% better in Rust than Celeron G1820 - 202 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $46.41 vs $250.26
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-9700 - $0.3 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $250.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
156
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |