Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-970 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-970 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3573 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-970.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-970
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $229.95 vs $442.14
- Up to 27% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-10900K - $1.63 vs $2.23 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 40% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-970 - 198 vs 141 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-970 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-970 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-970 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 19th, 2010
FPS
141
71%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $229.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
73%
Price, $
$442.14
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $442.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 19th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-970 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 19th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Gulftown | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |